THOUGHT LEADERSHIP

 

What Luxury Can Learn From Starbucks In China

Oct 23, 2013 James Button

A Starbucks in Shanghai. (bitslice cipher/Flickr)



There has been a great deal of media attention on Starbucks in China over the past few weeks, stemming from a Wall Street Journal article comparing Starbucks’ pricing in China and the United States and culminating in CCTV’s recent exposé of the American coffee company’s China pricing.

Although price differences between China and the rest of the world are a major driver of consumer spending behavior, consumer perception and support for Starbucks has been remarkably resilient in the face of the recent media onslaught and the brand may actually benefit from CCTV’s free PR campaign. Why Starbucks has been able to avoid a consumer backlash for its China pricing provides three key lessons for luxury brands that are trying to engage with China’s increasingly global consumers:

Chinese consumers don’t like feeling ripped off

Starbucks was a poorly chosen target for CCTV’s smear campaign, for the simple reason that its China pricing is more closely aligned with global levels than nearly every premium category. While a Starbucks coffee costs roughly 25 percent more in Shanghai than in New York, premium apparel, cosmetics, and handbags are commonly 40 to 100 percent more expensive in China than abroad. Chinese consumers are aware of these large price differences* and are (understandably) unwilling to purchase domestically when they have other options. That said, in my firm’s recent study of Chinese tourists Europe, consumers rarely knew actual price differences between China and Europe and price comparisons between European countries were almost nonexistent. Not wanting to be ripped off* is the primary driver of overseas purchasing behavior, rather than an attempt to find the lowest price.

With that in mind, consumers accept in principal that foreign brands should cost slightly more in China than they do abroad, and are willing to pay a small premium for convenient access to these products. Starbucks’ 25 percent premium is within these tolerance levels. A nearly 100 percent premium for Kiehl’s skincare products is not, and drives consumers to purchase abroad or through a shopping agent. Luxury brands, take notice.

Consumers are willing to pay for experiences

Starbucks is not about coffee. Starbucks is an experience—and this is even more so the case in China where the local Starbucks is a key destination for business meetings, study sessions and catching up with friends. Consumers don’t begrudge paying Starbucks’ prices because the value they receive (a few hours in a nice, quiet location, free Wi-Fi, and the prestige of a premium venue) goes far beyond the price of a coffee. This same logic applies to luxury brands. Luxury is a category driven by emotions, and brands can negate consumers’ feeling of being “ripped off” when paying the “China price” by creating unique experiences that add value beyond a simple transaction. Already, brands are being more innovative in engaging with their Chinese customers, and we expect to see more following in the footsteps of brands such as Hublot.

There are opportunities in non-transferrable categories

If a consumer wants a cheaper Starbucks latte, they can’t order it online or have a friend bring it back from an overseas shopping trip. Likewise, there will always be luxury products or categories that are more protected than others from international pricing differentials. Domestic demand for luxury cars, despite being more than double the price in China than abroad, is not going anywhere since customers don’t have alternatives to paying the China. Demand for last-minute jewelry gifts is enduring, as any boyfriend or husband will know. Made-to-measure suits, with multiple fittings, face logistical challenges for targeting the Chinese traveler and will always be more convenient to purchase at home.

As easily transferrable purchases shift online and abroad, there are winners and losers in the domestic market at both the brand and the category level. To be maximize their success, luxury groups and brands should identify what categories are protected from this trend and optimize their portfolios and domestic presence accordingly.

*Adding insult to injury, consumers believe the bulk of the price difference goes to the government. Nobody likes taxes. On the bright side, brands are not necessarily the number one target for consumer wrath over the China Price.



About the Author

James Button is Director at SmithStreeta growth consultancy based in Shanghai, where he works with a number of premium and luxury brands on their China entry, growth, and e-commerce strategies. James is also a columnist of Jing Daily, a media focusing on the business of luxury and culture in China.

Follow James and SmithStreet on Twitter.



Connect with SmithStreet
In the News

Technology|Jun 14, 2017

Programmatic Advertising in China

Consumer Goods|May 22, 2017

China Will Allow U.S. Beef Imports

Luxury|May 11, 2017

China's Return to Great Retail Service

Reuters|Nov 18, 2016

New Look Seeks Fashion Edge in China with Local Designs

Bloomberg|Jul 18, 2016

Nestle Seeks China Turnaround Online as Competitors Abound

LoginNot a registered user? Register now.
E-mail
Password
Remember me

Login using your social network

RegisterAlready registered? Login now.

SmithStreet provides you source for today’s leading business ideas. Our content explores the topics critical to China market today.

Create your SmithStreet account:

E-mail address & password

*E-mail
Make sure you typed it correctly.
*Password
Make it 6-10 characters, no spaces
*Confirm Password

Personal Information

*First Name
*Last Name
Company
Job Title
Job Function
Country
Screen Name

Subscribe

Subscribe to our China Spotlight weekly news feed - a complimentary email newsletter that matters to your China strategy.

Healthcare

Consumers and Retail

I agree with the Legal Terms.
RegisterAlready registered?

Create your SmithStreet account:

*E-mail
Make sure you typed it correctly.
*Password
Make it 6-10 characters, no spaces
*Confirm Password

Personal Information

*First Name
*Last Name
Company
Job Title
Job Function
Country
Screen Name
Legal Terms
This is the official privacy policy for www.smithstreetchina.com, which is administered, owned and operated by SmithStreet. This policy is intended to provide you with important information regarding your use of the Site.

This Site is owned, operated and targeted for use in China and may not comply with other nation’s laws or regulations. Your continued use of this Site implies your acceptance of our policies and practices as described below.

We do not collect any personally identifiable information from visitors to the site unless they voluntarily submit information.

You may choose to subscribe to our email edition, which requires you to submit a valid email address. This service is operated for free on an opt-in basis, and you may unsubscribe at any time by emailing info@smithstreetsolutions.com.

The information we collect is used for internal review and is then discarded, used to improve the content of our website page.

We do not set any cookies.

If you do not want to receive e-mail from us in the future, please let us know by sending us e-mail at the above address.

All of the content posted on our Site is created in-house. We do summarize news from other resources by following fair convention. If, for any reason, you would like us to remove any content, graphics, or other information that you consider a breach of copyright law, please email us, or feel free to call us by below number.

We reserve the right to revise this policy at any time. Revisions will be posted in this location. Any and all posted revisions are effective immediately. Please check back often to stay informed about your use of the Site.

Please contact us directly if you have any questions about this Policy or anything else.

Email: info@smithstreetsolutions.com
Tel: (8621) 6565 6533

This Policy was last modified on November 1st, 2013 and is effective immediately.